Paper Ten

If you find this series informative please take action. Hundreds of millions of suffering Muslims need your help. Please help spread the word through Twitter, Facebook and other social media.

Baba Vanga; A Blind Bulgarian Mystic, Clairvoyant and Herbalist

Has Predicted Many Things Including the Rise of ISIS and the September 11, 2001 Attacks on the USA

It is said that Baba Vanga, a blind Bulgarian mystic, clairvoyant and herbalist has predicted many important past events and futie events. Among them are:

  • The rise of ISIS
  • The 44th US President would be black
  • Dates of death of Hitler, Stalin and Princess Diana
  • Attacks on the World Trade Center
  • Collapse of the Soviet Union
  • Revival of communism in Europe by 2076
  • 2066 US attack on Muslim controlled Europe

We are a team of three persons who have attempted to write a ten-paper series exposing Islam. We are not mystic, nor do we claim to be visionaries as Baba Vanga or Nostradamus.

We will however, examine Baba Vanga’s and Nostradamus’ predictions and offer factual analysis through the prism of events currently taking place right now before the very eyes of the Western European world that is apparently asleep at the wheel.  Specifically, we will look closely at two of her predictions and comment accordingly based on the extensive research we have done for this anti-Muslim ten paper exposé.

In the next fifty years we predict the following:

1. Capitalism/USA Will Cease to be the Number One World Economy

Capitalism will lose momentum in the United States because of government corruption. The USA will lose its top spot in the global economy in large part due to the vast influence and economic power of powerful lobbyists on behalf of such self-serving industries as the Silicon Valley, pharmaceutical giants, oil and gas, and the entertainment industry. Their ability to buy influence over US politicians and garner votes to further their own self-serving agendas will ultimately collapse the American economic system as we know it. The downfall that began with the corruption of the Clinton gang and continued with President Obama will finally result in the financial downfall of the United States from its top spot in the world.

The United States has ceased to be the country of justice and democracy it once was. Politicians continually underestimate the intelligence of their constituency. One example from the Silicon Valley is Alphabet Inc, the parent company of Google. They alone spend ten of millions of dollars annually in political campaign contributions and lobbying efforts. These large contributions give them power over the elected officials they helped put into office. They are repaid by the politicians they help elect in the form of votes to further their legislative agendas. Most of their donations are done in secret and defraud voters.

If swift action is not taken to reverse this government corruption, the USA will lose its economic might. All forms of political donations to individuals and PAC’s must be banned. One solution is to impose a half of a percent tax which would then be distributed proportionately to candidates and political parties.

The United States is no longer a government controlled and run by the people. It is run by deep-pocketed industries like the Silicon Valley, big pharma and the Hollywood elites to name just a few. The people are the ones who end up paying a steep price. The system is out of control and could result in China and the newly re-formed Soviet Union overtaking the United States economically.


The Clinton Foundation

A criminal investigation of the Clinton Foundation is needed immediately. Since 2001, over two billion dollars has been raised by the former US President’s “charitable organization.” In his recent book, Clinton Cash, author Peter Schweizer writes an eye-popping account of how foreign governments helped make the Clintons wealthy beyond their wildest dreams after leaving the Oval office in 2001. The former president’s organization has created a model for other politicians to line their pockets with ill-gotten gains following their political careers. American politicians are becoming a corrupt machine like the systems we see in Africa and the Middle East.

All forms of political contributions must end now!  It would be more productive and beneficial for the nation in the end, if instead we just double the salaries for Senators and Congressional Representatives. Any politician who extorts money while serving or following his or her time in office is betraying their oath to serve their constituents.

As for former President Obama, how much money has been donated to his foundation by recipients of his political favors and his friends in Hollywood and the Silicon Valley, with whom he became quite cozy?



President Trump’s economic and immigration policies can Make America Great Again. We need his policies in effect for the next twenty years to undo the mess his predecessors have left in their wake. Trump is the first president in modern times to not be politically correct. It is about time the United States has a president with the courage to tell it like it.

Christians of all denominations should support President Trump, as he is committed to protect their rights and religious history.

Democrats need to open their eyes and leave the party that has failed them with leaders like the Socialist/Communist lunatic, Bernie Sanders and Islamists like Keith Ellison who supports sharia law. I am not a Republican or a Democrat. I am a realist and a visionary. Trump’s policies are timely and can make America great again!


President Trump

Will you be the first president to protect the United States of America’s religious liberty and its sacred US Constitution by ordering the closing of all mosques that support and teach sharia law? Someone needs to step up and protect Christians of all denominations from Islamization. Europe needs a leader in the mold of Donald Trump.


2. The New Soviet Union

Do not be shocked to see the revival of the Soviet Union. Andre Merkel’s Islamization of Europe has given Russia the perfect reason to occupy, not only Eastern Europe but also Western Europe. Russia will never accept an Islamic Europe on its own doorstep. Sooner or later, Russia will be return to its Soviet Union might it once had. Europe will be significantly weakened by Islam. Russia will move in to save Europe and become occupiers.

Andrea Merkel and her government will go down in history as the worst German leaders ever in power; damaging Germany even more than did Hitler. Chancellor Merkel believes the Americans will come to aid of Germany should Russia make a move against them. Dream on!  Not only will America not come to their rescue, but they may even encourage Russian occupation of Europe.

Will Russia make its move to occupy a European Islamic country within the next five years if invited to do so? We believe the nationalist/conservative parties of Sweden will invite the Russians to intervene and help rid them of the current Muslim occupation. Sweden will become a protectorate under the newly re-formed Soviet Union. Sweden will be left alone to run their country with a friendly protectorate agreement from the Russians.


Sweden is in Trouble

Sweden is getting closer and closer to becoming a Muslim state. In the next five years, Russia may have no choice but to enter Sweden and send all the Muslim Swedes back to their countries of origin. A move that will be welcomed by the majority of native white Swedes as no-go zones continue to expand and the Swedish culture is being increasingly devoured by Islam.


3. Will the USA attack Europe?


The USA will never allow a Europe that is controlled by Islamists. In 50 years or so, if Europe continues along Merkel’s path of Islamization, the United States will not tolerate a nuclear arsenal in the hands of an Islamic Europe. This will force a US attack on Europe. The only solution for Europe is to ban Islam, close all the mosques and repatriate all Muslims that fail to renounce the evil ways of Islam.


4. The latest corruption purge in Saudi Arabia


There is a power grab that will ignite a firestorm in the Middle-East between the Sunni and Shiite Muslims. The hypocritical so-called Saudi expert, Ali Shihabi, Executive Director of the Arab Foundation recently confirmed to another hypocrite, CNN’s Fareed Zakaria that the Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed Bin Salman was doing the right thing by purging the elite entitlement princes and businessmen but failed to purge himself of his own corruption.


Last year, Mohammed Bin Salman spent almost $500 million to purchase a yacht. Where did that money come from? The real questions that need to be answered are:

  1. How will Saudi Aramco will be launching what could be the world’s biggest IPO, valued at over $2 trillion?
  2. Will the Saudi Arabian purge foreclose on over one trillion dollars the Saudis will use to purchase arms from the US?
  3. How many Aramco shares have been indirectly given to American leaders?
  4. Is the price of oil headed to top $100 per barrel in order to harm the Chinese economy and support US shale gas production?

A war in the Middle-East between Iranian Shiites and Saudi Arabian Sunnis is inevitable and could result in the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz is the geographical choke point and a major artery for the transportation of oil from the Middle-East. With China receiving more than 60% of its oil traveling via this route, any interruption could cause a recession.


5. Pakistani Nuclear Threat


Fanatical Islamists are almost in full control of Pakistan. These Islamists believe they will be rewarded in heaven with 72 virgins for blowing up the West, including the United States. North Korea, who most fear as a significant nuclear threat, poses no threat at all in comparison to Pakistan with all their nuclear warheads pointed west. The Pakistani nuclear arsenal must be dismantled now, and India must be strengthened.

Future papers will explore these issues more deeply. A Middle-East war has already begun. The casualties of this war will be innocent people and children.

Western Constitutions Should be Challenged on Islam

Simply stated, freedom of expression does not allow anyone to hurt others or to teach how to hurt others. Islam and its sharia encourages does exactly that. It encourages and teaches such awful practices as the raping of children, marrying little girls as young as six years old, the stoning to death of homosexuals, beating women, female genital mutilation, prostitution as a form of temporary marriage, cheating non-Muslims, divorce with no rights to the wife, “martyring” oneself in order to kill others, and many other horrendous practices.

Below is a piece which was written by a well-respected doctor theology and constitutional expert:

Professing vs. Inciting


Any discussion of religion brooks the danger of misunderstanding and angry response.  It is not my intent to engender anger or to write an exposé of Islam.  It is, however, my desires to sound a warning voice about the patterns that can be seen in many nations where tolerance of religion, particularly tolerance of  Islam, has led to a loss of rights for women and children and for adherents of all other faiths. 

This book represents my profession of faith.  It is not my desire to incite aggression against any faith, but to urge others to protect against the aggression of any religious group that subjugates women and children of its faith and adherents of all other faith in the name of their God.  It is to remind all of us that, to some degree, freedom of religion must also embrace freedom from religion,

Common Law countries including Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States, have included Freedom of Religion as one of the basic elements in their charters of human rights.  But there are necessary limitations of that freedom, or any other freedom that extends the predilections of one individual over another.  John Stuart Mill, one of the fathers of modern Libertarianism, recognized the importance of such limitations in the following passage from On Liberty:

I have already observed that, owing to the absence of any recognised general principles, liberty is often granted where it should be withheld, as well as withheld where it should be granted; and one of the cases in which, in the modern European world, the sentiment of liberty is the strongest, is a case where, in my view, it is altogether misplaced.

A person should be free to do as he likes in his own concerns; but he ought not to be free to do as he likes in acting for another, under the pretext that the affairs of the other are his own affairs. The State, while it respects the liberty of each in what specially regards himself, is bound to maintain a vigilant control over his exercise of any power which it allows him to possess over others.

 This obligation is almost entirely disregarded in the case of the family relations, a case, in its direct influence on human happiness, more important than all others taken together. The almost despotic power of husbands over wives needs not be enlarged upon here, because nothing more is needed for the complete removal of the evil, than that wives should have the same rights, and should receive the protection of law in the same manner, as all other persons; and because, on this subject, the defenders of established injustice do not avail themselves of the plea of liberty, but stand forth openly as the champions of power.

It is in the case of children, that misapplied notions of liberty are a real obstacle to the fulfilment by the State of its duties. One would almost think that a man’s children were supposed to be literally, and not metaphorically, a part of himself, so jealous is opinion of the smallest interference of law with his absolute and exclusive control over them; more jealous than of almost any interference with his own freedom of action: so much less do the generality of mankind value liberty than power. Consider, for example, the case of education. Is it not almost a self-evident axiom, that the State should require and compel the education, up to a certain standard, of every human being who is born its citizen? Yet who is there that is not afraid to recognise and assert this truth? Hardly any one indeed will deny that it is one of the most sacred duties of the parents (or, as law and usage now stand, the father), after summoning a human being into the world, to give to that being an education fitting him to perform his part well in life towards others and towards himself….! It still remains unrecognised, that to bring a child into existence without a fair prospect of being able, not only to provide food for its body, but instruction and training for its mind, is a moral crime, both against the unfortunate offspring and against society; and that if the parent does not fulfil this obligation, the State ought to see it fulfilled, at the charge, as far as possible, of the parent[1]. (underlining and paragraph breaks are not in the original.

In a discussion of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, prepared by the United Nations and subscribed to by most member states, [2] Nazila Ghanea


The very enjoyment of human rights in one area, such as freedom to have, adopt or change a religion or belief of one’s choice (Article 18, ICCPR), is largely facilitated by freedom of expression.. This alerts us to the need to be as open as possible with regards to

critical expressions of diverging ideas related to religious or other beliefs….

Article 20 of the ICCPR, described as being “among the strongest condemnations of

hate speech”,[3] states

  1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
  2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes

incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.

Article 20(2) “does not require States parties to prohibit advocacy of hatred in private

that instigates non-violent acts of racial or religious discrimination”.[4] It does,

however, require them to prohibit – though not necessarily criminalise[5]– other


Incitement’ is used as a shorthand for Article 20(2)’s “advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law”. This is a far more specific articulation than the general reference to ‘hate speech’, defined by one author as “speech designed to promote hatred on the basis of race, religion, ethnicity or national origin”.6

It is on the cusp of this important distinction that this book rests.  The information that I share is intended to prompt thought and recognition of some of the dangers that a totalitarian religious state may pose, but it is not intended to incite any behaviors that would violate the freedoms that we treasure. 

 Bertolt Brecht in a poor attempt to justify wrongdoing as the predicate of peaces, wrote:

For we knew only too well:

Even the hatred of squalor

Makes the brow grow stern.

Even anger against injustice

Makes the voice grow harsh. Alas, we

Who wished to lay the foundations of kindness

Could not ourselves be kind. 7


7 Bertolt Brecht, “To Posterity”

  1. Mill, John Stuart, On liberty, paragraph 12 of On Liberty “Chapter V: Applications”


  1. Nazila Ghanea, “ Prohibition Of Incitement To National, Racial Or Religious Hatred In Accordance With International Human Rights Law, Expert Seminar For The European Region, 9 and 10 February, 2011” See Nazila Ghanea, “Compilation of Relevant International Instruments relating to ‘incitement’ and ‘defamation’, Eleven points for consideration.expression”


  1. Eric Heinze ‘Viewpoint Absolutism and Hate Speech’ 69.4 The Modern Law Review (2006) p. 544. See

.Manfred Nowak U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, CCPR Commentary (Kehl: NP Engel Publisher,

1993) p. 475.  See: Article 19 Briefing note on International and Comparative Defamation Standards (London, February 2004) available at (last accessed February



Michael Rosenfeld ‘Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis’ 24 Cordozo Law Review (2003) p. 1523. This has been critiqued by a number of authors including Partsch. See: K. J. Partsch ‘Racial Speech and Human Rights: Article 4 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination’ in Sandra Coliver (ed.) Striking a Balance: Hate Speech, Freedom of Expression and Non-discrimiantion (London: Article 19 and University of Essex: Human Rights Centre, 1992) pp. 27-28.

  1. Michael Rosenfeld ‘Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis’ 24 Cordozo Law Review (2003) p. 1523.
  2. This has been critiqued by a number of authors including Partsch. See: K. J. Partsch ‘Racial Speech and

Human Rights: Article 4 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination’ in Sandra

Coliver (ed.) Striking a Balance: Hate Speech, Freedom of Expression and Non-discrimiantion (London: Article

19 and University of Essex: Human Rights Centre, 1992) pp. 27-28.

Yilmaz-Dogan v. The Netherlands, CERD Report, 1988, GAOR A/43/18, Annex IV, para. 6.6.

See also: Patrick Thornberry ‘Forms of Hate Speech and the Convention on the Elimination of All

Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)’, Conference room paper 11, Expert seminar on the links

between articles 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR):

Freedom of expression and advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to

discrimination, hostility or violence, (2-3 October 2008, Geneva), available at (last accessed February


  1. Patrick Thornberry ‘Forms of Hate Speech and the Convention on the Elimination of All

Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)’, Conference room paper 11, Expert seminar on the links

between articles 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR):

Freedom of expression and advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to

discrimination, hostility or violence, (2-3 Oct


Note to readers:

God loves all human beings. He treats them as equals and protects the innocent, helpless and voiceless, especially the children. Allah (the devil) and Muhammed (the evil) support child rape, genital mutilation, the stoning of gays, degrading of women and the killing and cheating of non-Muslims.

Now we have exposed this fake and fabricated religion called Islam. You should be ashamed of being a Muslim. Any Muslim choosing to remain Muslim after reading and fact checking this material is simply following a horrific political movement.

All mosques must be shut down and we must take a position of zero tolerance.

We do not support any violence or hate speech against Muslims. We support freedom to speak against Islam. We support expressions through peaceful uprising, demonstrations and the ballot box.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *